Evidences of Pakistani raid of Jannat-e-Firdaus in 1947
| Brig RK Bhatia (Rtd) - 22 Oct 2021

Not withstanding Pakistan’s continuous denial of any involvement in tribesmen’s invasion into Kashmir, there are substantial pieces of evidences to prove Pakistan’s whole hearted assistance. The details are given in this article.

By Brigadier RK Bhatia (Rtd)

‘Gar firdaus bar-rooh-e zameen ast, Hami asto, hamin asto, hamin ast’

This couplet by celebrated mystic, Sufi poet Amir Khusro describes all that can be saidabout the beauty of Kashmir ‘if there is a paradise on earth, it is this, it is this, it is this’.But alas! this ‘paradise on earth’ continues to suffer continuing grief ever since Pakistanlaid its evil eye on it and violated its pious land on 22 Oct 1947.

Background of Invasion in Kashmir
As the British decided to exit India, Maharaja Hari Singh of Kashmir, aspiring to keep theJammu and Kashmir as an independent nation, did not accede to either of the newlyformed nations. Pakistan laid claim on Kashmir since it is a Muslim majority region. Itignored the fact that the criterion of division along religious majority applied only to the regions directly colonized by the British and not to princely states like J&K. The Indian troops on the other handset foot in Kashmir to counter the perpetrators ofviolence on Kashmir only after the Maharaja signed the ‘Instrument of Accession’ on 26Oct 1947.

Importance of Kashmir 
Kashmir is a very strong symbol for both India and Pakistan, even if their views on thestate conflict ideologically. While India considers Kashmir essential for its secularidentity, for Pakistan, its acquisition is necessary to complete the division of India onreligious basis. For Pakistan, the merger of Kashmir remains an unfinished agenda of partition. Without including Muslim majority J&K, in its core, Pakistan considers itselfincomplete as a nation which may fail or even collapse. Apart from religion Pakistan alsoquotes ethnicity, geography, and legality for Kashmir to be its part. This lofty romanticism about Kashmir's cause and solidarity with their Muslim brethren of J&K is nothing but a smokescreen to grab Kashmir for economic and military reasons. The Pakistani historian, Mr. Ishtiaq Ahmed has called it a Hydro-Political problem of Pakistan.

Kashmir and Strategic (Pakistani) Punjab

As is the case elsewhere, Pakistan views the merger of Kashmir through the narrow prismof the prosperity of Western (Pakistani) Punjab. Pakistani writings have highlighted the need for having Kashmir, not so much for honoring the wishes and safety of the Kashmiris, but for getting strategic depth to Pakistani Punjab and also for ensuring non-interference with river waters coming from Kashmir.

 Maj Gen Akbar Khan, who was part of the Kashmir liberation Committee and the self-proclaimed Commander-in-chief inKashmir in 1947-48, brings out the military and economic importance of Kashmir toPakistan in his book ‘Raiders in Kashmir’; ‘our own safety and welfare (read Western Punjab) demand that the state (Kashmir) should not go over to India. If Indian troops came to be stationed along Kashmir’s western border (with Pakistani Punjab), she (India) could establish its forces within a fewmiles of the 180-miles-long vital road and rail route between Lahore and Pindi (the entirestretch he speaks is in West Punjab).

‘From an economic point of view, the position was equally clear. Our agricultural economy (again in Punjab) was dependent particularly upon the rivers coming out of Kashmir.’

Social Fabric of Kashmir
Prior to dwelling further into the unscrupulous attempt of wresting Kashmir as it unfolded during Oct 1947, it would be worth recalling the social fabric as it existed in Kashmir of those days.In her book‘ Between the Great divide’, Pakistani author Anam Zakaria has given innumerable examples of traditionally secular and tolerant practices of Kashmiris, both Muslims and Hindus. ‘The degree of homogeneity was such that many Hindus and Muslims went to the extent of only consuming halal mutton instead of beef orpork to respect each other’s traditions and sensibilities.

 Such inter-communal harmony is also documented in the book ‘Wounded Memories’,written by Muhammad Saeed Asad, an author who hails from Mirpur in POK. He saysthat it was important for the residents of Kashmir to be Kashmiri rather than Muslim, Hindu or Sikh.‘The Sikhs and Hindus were familiar with and able to recite the verses ofthe Holy Quran just as much as Muslims could read Holy Granth.

The Grand Design

Within days of coming into being, Pakistan formed a ‘Kashmir Liberation Committee’ ledby Prime Minister Liaqat Ali Khan with Colonel (later Maj Gen) Akbar Khan as the military member. This committee decided to launch a tribal aggression into Kashmir toforce a dithering and militarily weak maharaja into joining Pakistan.

The objective of the dubious plan was to arouse communal passions, assassinate important leaders and capture power in Kashmir. The prevalent impression from a few incidents in Jammu and Poonch is that Muslims of the state had risen against the Government and wished to join Pakistan. Nothing could be farther from the truth. 

There is enough evidence to suggest that the Kashmir operation was not a spontaneous uprising by the tribesmen but a clandestine operation deliberately designed by Pakistanfor annexation of the state by force. Mr Prem Shanker Jha in his book ‘Kashmir, 1947,Rival Version of History’ states that the raiders were to be the real spearhead of thePakistan Government’s annexation plan. According to him ‘The instigation ofinsurrectionary activity and communal mayhem in Poonch and Jammu was a diversionary tactic designed to disperse and pin down the state forces and prevent themfrom regrouping at the mouth of Uri gorge which raiders had to pass before entering the Kashmir Valley.’

The uprising, according to the Pakistani conspirators, would be passed off as an actundertaken by irregulars on their own and that these lawless tribesmen could not be controlled by the newly established Pakistani state. However, there are enough pieces of evidence to prove that the irregulars were extensively supported by Pakistan’s provincialand federal governments.

Was it a Holy War?
Pakistan has spread a narrative that the tribesmen were incited to a ‘holy war’ by thestories of atrocities which fleeing Muslims brought with them to the market place ofPeshawar. But waging a ‘holy war’ was never on the agenda of these primitive tribesmen. They were lured with a promise of Zar (wealth), Sar (head) and Zan (women) of the innocent Kashmiris irrespective of his religion, gender or position, they did not differentiate between Hindus, Muslims or Sikhs. Anyone, who stopped these savages from indulging in plunder or pursuing their carnal pleasures were subjected to unseen and unheard-of violence. These tribal raids significantly altered the very fabric of the tolerant Valley.

Evidence of Pakistan’s Official Support

Not withstanding Pakistan’s continuous denial of any involvement in tribesmen’s invasion into Kashmir, there are substantial pieces of evidences to prove Pakistan’s whole hearted assistance. The details are as follows:

The leading Maliks (leaders) of the tribes who participated in the raid were secretlyinterviewed in Rawalpindi as early as 2nd October and tasked to organize Lashkars. TheseMaliks were rewarded handsomely.

There was a serious shortage of arms and ammunition as most of it still lay in India.As Director of Weapon and Equipment at GHQ, Colonel Akbar Khan knew that availableweapon meant for the Pakistan Army could not be used without the permission of theCommander-in-Chief General Messervy.Akbar Khan, however, managed to locate 4000rifles which were to be handed over to the Punjab Police. A large stock of old ammunitionwas also discovered, which was to be transported to Karachi and disposed off at sea, as ithad gone beyond its expiry date and therefore was deemed too dangerous to be used.These arms and ammunition were diverted to band of irregulars.
Petrol, (which was a scarce commodity in those days), food and camp administrativeservices were organized and provisioned by the Pak Army to the raiders.

A secret “Kashmir Fund” was set aside by Nawab of Mamdot, the Chief Minister of West Punjab. The Chief Minister of the Frontier Province, Abdul Qayyum Khan, who hailed from Poonch in Kashmir, gave his blessings and unqualified assistance including provisioning of 300-400 buses and lorries, without which the operation might not have been possible.

According to George Cunningham ‘Jinnah himself heard of it (the plan) but said ‘Don’t tell me anything of it. My conscience must remain clear’’. VP Menon, who was the right hand of Sardar Patel said in his book Integration of Indian States that ‘the raiders had free transit through Pakistan. They were in possession of modern military equipment which could only have been obtained from Pakistani Army sources; mortars, artillery, and Mark V mines are not the kind of armament which tribesmen possess.’

A large number of Army officers had joined the tribesmen and organized the attacks on the state and Indian Army. The professionalism displayed could not be expected of any untrained personnel.

If Raids had not Happened

It is worth pondering over the scenario in case the invasion by the raiders had not taken place. Possibility of Maharaja joining Pakistan existed. Indian Home Minister Sardar Patel had left the choice to the Maharaja. Lord Mountbatten too advised the Maharaja to join one of the two dominions, as two bigger nations in its neighbourhood would not let it remain independent.

Mr VP Menon states: "We had no territorial ambitions in Kashmir. If the invasion had not happened, I can say in the face of any contradiction that the Government of India would have left Kashmir alone’. Lord Mountbatten on his return to England publicly stated that he had, on the authority of the Government of India, informed the Maharaja that he was perfectly free to accede to Pakistan if he chooses to do so."

The slaughter of innocent women and children belonging to all faiths by the invaders probably lost Pakistan any faint communal co-operation they might have expected in the Valley of Kashmir.


Pakistan was in a hurry to grab Kashmir. Its leaders got impatient and apprehensive thatthe Maharaja may not be inclined to join them. In order to present a fait accompli to theMaharaja, Pakistan unleashed unruly and undisciplined tribesmen on innocent Kashmiris who had never heard or seen such savagery in their lives. Lord Cunningham, the Governor of NWFP noted ‘because of the excesses of the tribesmen, many Muslims of Kashmir would have adhered to India and not to Pakistan, if a plebiscite had been held. 

(Disclaimer: The opinions expressed above are the personal views of the author and do not reflect the views of Indian Observer Post.)

About the Author: 

Brig RK Bhatia (Rtd) has had an illustrious career in the elite Intelligence Corps of the Indian Army for over three decades. During his entire span of service, he undertook operations pertaining to intelligence acquisition and counter-Terrorism. 


INDIAN OBSERVER POST (IOP) is a Class, Creative, and Constructive News platform which publishes ONLY exclusive and Special News / Views / Interviews / Research Articles / Analysis / Columns / Features and Opinions on the national and international issues, politics, security, energy, innovation, infrastructure, rural, health, education, women, and entertainment. Email – editor@indianobserverpost.com

INDIAN OBSERVER POST (Eng) -www.indianobserverpost.com

INDIAN OBSERVER POST (Hindi) -www.indianobserverpost.in

IOP ON FACEBOOK - https://bit.ly/2SlmpLA

IOP TEAM BUREAUS & WRITERS - https://bit.ly/2LxOU2I


(Onkareshwar Pandey is Founder, Editor in Chief & CEO, Indian Observer Post and former Senior Group Editor- Rashtriya Sahara (Hindi & Urdu) and also former Editor, (News), ANI. http://bit.ly/2mh7hih Email - SMS- 9910150119)





Browse By Tags

Latest News