The Captured Watchdog: Broken Trust and Professor Rahul Gandhi’s Struggle to Save Democracy
| Onkareshwar Pandey - Editor in Chief - CEO - 06 Nov 2025

After the “Atom Bomb” press conference in Bengaluru, Rahul Gandhi’s “Operation Sarkar Chori” in Haryana has shattered public trust in India’s Election Commission under Modi.

“Ultimately, the strength of a democracy is not in its laws but in the honesty of those who implement them.”
Jawaharlal Nehru, Lok Sabha, 1951

By Onkareshwar Pandey

No matter how fervently Prime Minister Narendra Modi may wish to erase Nehru’s legacy, he cannot escape this truth. The moral line Nehru drew for India’s institutions still stands—untouched, unapproached. Today, that line divides a nation that once trusted its democratic machinery from one that now watches it crumble, beginning with the Election Commission of India (ECI).

On 5 November 2025, Rahul Gandhi walked onto the stage with a thick dossier titled the H-Files. The atmosphere was electric. Cameras flashed, reporters leaned forward, and the Congress leader began—not with rhetoric, but with data. This was his second major exposé on electoral irregularities, following his earlier “Atom Bomb” press conference in Bengaluru. This time, the target was Haryana.

The Hydrogen Bomb: Haryana and the Collapse of Electoral Credibility

In a live bilingual press conference, Gandhi unveiled “Operation Sarkar Chori”, alleging a democratic heist in Haryana. He claimed 25 lakh votes were manipulated to favour the BJP, presenting the H-Files—a dossier detailing:

  • 1.7 lakh duplicate voters (same names, fathers’ names, and ages)
  • 4.4 lakh voters with faulty addresses
  • 7.5 lakh voters linked to a single invalid phone number
  • Alarming irregularities in postal ballots and house-based registrations

“This is not a party issue,” Gandhi declared. “This is about the theft of people’s right to choose—about Loktantra ki chori. India’s democracy is dead.”

Within hours, hashtags like #HFiles and #SarkarChori began trending nationwide.

The Brazilian Model

Gandhi termed it a “Hydrogen Bomb on democracy”, accusing the BJP of deploying a “Brazilian Model” of voter roll fraud—not EVM hacking, but a sophisticated manipulation that “adds ghosts and deletes citizens.” He cited examples of voters like “Sweety” and “Saraswati” allegedly appearing over 200 times in rolls across constituencies.

The BJP dismissed the allegations as “a bundle of lies,” while the ECI issued its standard response: “baseless and irresponsible.” But Gandhi’s counter was sharp:

“If it’s baseless, then prove it—make the electoral rolls public in machine-readable form. What are you hiding?”

That unanswered question now symbolizes the crisis of transparency that has turned the world’s largest democracy into one of its most doubted.

The Atom Bomb: Bengaluru and the 2024 Lok Sabha Exposé

Before Haryana, there was Karnataka. On 7 August 2025, Gandhi dropped what he called an “Atom Bomb on our democracy”, presenting data from Bengaluru Central during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. He alleged mass deletion of genuine voters and insertion of fake ones, citing turnout anomalies and suppressed data.

Independent investigations by The Reporters’ Collective and journalist Ajit Anjum later substantiated irregularities in voter lists across Bengaluru and Mysuru. The BJP again called it “desperation from defeat,” while the ECI repeated its template: “voter roll cleaning is routine.” Yet, none of Gandhi’s data points were disproved with evidence.

Bihar’s SIR and the Voters’ Adhikar Yatra

In Bihar, where assembly elections are underway, Gandhi and Tejashwi Yadav took the battle from data sheets to dusty roads. The Special Intensive Revision (SIR) drive by the ECI claimed to remove “foreign nationals” and “duplicate entries.” But the numbers told a different story:

  • Only 11,484 names flagged as “untraceable”
  • No evidence of Bangladeshi or Nepali voters
  • Yet, lakhs of genuine voters, mostly poor and marginalized, found their names missing
  • Even the flagged names were not handed to police for deportation

The Voters’ Adhikar Yatra, joined by leaders like Mamata Banerjee, Akhilesh Yadav, M.K. Stalin, Uddhav Thackeray, and Sharad Pawar, became a mass movement for voter justice. Gandhi sat for tea with elderly villagers whose names were deleted, saying:

“These are not errors; these are erased citizens.”

Activist Yogendra Yadav later presented live “dead voters” in the Supreme Court, exposing the chaos of the SIR process. Even after revisions, serious errors persisted—what Gandhi called a “deliberate design to sterilize democracy.”

The Wall of Opacity: “It Will Take 272 Years”

The rot runs deeper than fraud—it reeks of institutional contempt. When activists filed RTIs seeking counting-day CCTV footage from the 2019 general elections, the ECI replied:

“It would take 272 years to compile the data.”
The Wire Hindi

This absurdity became a national metaphor for bureaucratic mockery. Legal activist Adv. Mehmood Pracha later forced the ECI to admit in court that it had changed its policy to provide electoral records only in non-searchable PDFs, making independent audits impossible.

“Opacity is not a technical glitch; it’s a political strategy.”Mehmood Pracha

In sum, Rahul Gandhi’s exposés—from Bengaluru to Haryana to Bihar—have not just challenged the BJP’s electoral conduct but exposed a systemic erosion of democratic integrity. The watchdog is captured. The trust is broken. And the struggle to save democracy is no longer rhetorical—it is existential.

ADR’s Alarm and Maharashtra’s Mystery Surge

The Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) has consistently raised red flags about the Election Commission’s conduct. In a petition before the Supreme Court, ADR highlighted over 10 lakh dubious voter registrations detected in Maharashtra ahead of local body polls. The 2024 Lok Sabha–Assembly comparison revealed a sudden, unexplained surge in voter turnout, even in regions historically marked by low participation.

ADR also exposed the ECI’s flip-flop on electoral bonds—initially opposing them in court, then quietly endorsing them under government pressure. The pattern was unmistakable: a captured referee batting for one team, not the Constitution.

The Captured Commission — Birth of the “Tota” Election Body

The institutional capture of India’s Election Commission began on 11 August 2023, when the Modi government introduced a Bill in the Rajya Sabha to rewrite the rules for appointing Election Commissioners. As reported by The Times of India, the Bill removed the Chief Justice of India from the selection panel, replacing the judiciary’s voice with a Union Cabinet Minister nominated by the Prime Minister.

This gave the government a 2-1 majority in appointing the very body meant to supervise its elections. Worse, the Bill downgraded the status of the Chief Election Commissioner and colleagues from the level of Supreme Court judges to Cabinet Secretaries, stripping them of authority to summon senior bureaucrats or reprimand ministers.

A senior lawyer told TOI: 

This change cripples the Commission’s power to hold the executive accountable during elections.”

The amendment effectively nullified the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Anoop Baranwal v. Union of India (March 2023), which had mandated an independent collegium of the Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and Chief Justice of India. Within months, the government reversed it by law—ensuring total executive control.

From that day forward, India’s ECI became what critics now call the “Tota (Parrot) Commission”—a constitutional parrot, gilded by legality but caged by loyalty.

The BJP’s Defence—and Its Own Undoing

The BJP’s repeated defence of the ECI has ironically confirmed its control over it. Ministers mocked Rahul Gandhi’s data as “laughable,” while refusing public audits of electoral rolls or 100% VVPAT verification. Every time the ECI is cornered, it is BJP spokespersons—not Commissioners—who speak on its behalf.

Their favourite taunt—“Go to court”—has become a tactic of delay. Gandhi reminded the press that a simple panchayat voter fraud case in Haryana took four years to reach judgment.

“Justice delayed in elections,” he said, “is democracy denied forever.”

The Rise of Professor Rahul Gandhi

For a decade, the Modi government spent crores branding Rahul Gandhi as “Pappu.” But his two bilingual, fact-laden press conferences—the Atom Bomb and the Hydrogen Bomb—have transformed that caricature. Today, he stands not merely as an opposition leader but as “a professor of politics and a guardian of democratic memory.”

In an era of silence, Gandhi has forced a national conversation about the sanctity of the vote.

The Path Ahead: Questions the ECI Must Answer

India’s democracy now demands answers from its Election Commission:

  • Why were machine-readable electoral rolls replaced with non-searchable PDFs?
  • Why was CCTV footage from counting centres denied under absurd excuses?
  • Why are 100% VVPAT audits still resisted despite Supreme Court observations?
  • Why are voter deletions and additions not subject to independent verification?
  • Why does the ECI need the BJP to defend its integrity instead of doing so itself?

The answers to these questions will decide whether the world’s largest democracy can still call itself one.

A Philosophical Reckoning

As Mahatma Gandhi wrote in Young India (1925):

“The spirit of democracy cannot be imposed from without. It has to come from within.”

The Rig Veda reminds us: 

“Let noble thoughts come to us from every side.”

Yet noble thoughts are meaningless if institutions refuse to hear. India does not need a captured Commission—it needs a courageous one. And as Swami Vivekananda warned: 

“The great sin is to forget our own strength.”

It is time to remember that strength.
It is time to reclaim the referee.
It is time to revamp the Election Commission of India—not for Rahul Gandhi, but for the Republic itself.

Sources and Citations:

 


Browse By Tags



Latest News